Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata-10: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- La mia bella recensione resource_signing_alg_values_supported No default algorithms are implied if this entry is omitted. What does this imply? Does it mean a value can be supplied later? Or that the request will never be able to succeed? In Section 5.1 there is an error message, but unlike earlier in the document, there seems to be no language support here. I guess that is a shortcoming of RFC6750. I am also interested to hear the response to Orie's DISCUSS _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list -- oauth@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to oauth-le...@ietf.org
