Events without label "editorial"

Issues
------
* oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens (+9/-1/💬16)
 9 issues created:
 - `subject_token` description needs to be more flexible (by tulshi)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/121 - The "N_A" value for the "txn" claim can complicate processing (by tulshi) https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/120 - Azd claim name conflict with RAR (by tulshi) https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/119 - RAR object inside a TraT (by tulshi) https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/118 - IANA registration procedures (by tulshi) https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/117 - Audience, scope & purpose (by arndt-s) https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/115 - Seconds vs. milliseconds in the example (by dteleguin) https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/114 - subject_token_type for Replacement Txn-Token Request (by dteleguin) https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/113 - please add document history to the draft (by Sakurann) https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/112
 9 issues received 16 new comments:
 - #120 The "N_A" value for the "txn" claim can complicate processing (1 by 
tulshi)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/120 - #119 Azd claim name conflict with RAR (2 by jricher, tulshi) https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/119 - #118 RAR object inside a TraT (2 by gffletch, jricher) https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/118 - #115 Audience, scope & purpose (4 by arndt-s, gffletch, obfuscoder) https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/115 - #114 Seconds vs. milliseconds in the example (1 by gffletch) https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/114 - #113 subject_token_type for Replacement Txn-Token Request (1 by gffletch) https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/113 - #111 Batch or long running processes and extending lifetime of a token (2 by gffletch, tulshi) https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/111 - #110 Tx token lifetime guidance missing for replacement token (1 by PieterKas) https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/110 - #108 A dummy transaction token - useful for debugging (2 by ashayraut, tulshi) https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/108
 1 issues closed:
- Seconds vs. milliseconds in the example https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/114
* oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc (+6/-0/💬5)
 6 issues created:
 - Drop all references to DIDs and DID resolution - rely on extensibility 
already in the draft (by leifj)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc/issues/250 - Suggestion: Should this spec be more open to multiple Credential formats? [W3C Verifiable Credentials 2.0] (by goncalo-frade-iohk) https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc/issues/249 - Provide information where a credential can be obtained (by danielfett) https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc/issues/248 - Potential Privacy implications of verifier knowing display information (by Sakurann) https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc/issues/247 - clarify example(s) (by bc-pi) https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc/issues/246 - Ambiguity what should happen when no `kid` parameter is present in header when DID is used as `iss` value (by TimoGlastra) https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc/issues/245
 3 issues received 5 new comments:
 - #250 Drop all references to DIDs and DID resolution (2 by bc-pi, selfissued)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc/issues/250 - #248 Provide information where a credential can be obtained (1 by awoie) https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc/issues/248 - #245 Ambiguity what should happen when no `kid` parameter is present in header when DID is used as `iss` value (2 by bc-pi, peacekeeper) https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc/issues/245
* oauth-wg/oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt (+1/-0/💬0)
 1 issues created:
 - (maybe) clarify example(s)  (by bc-pi)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt/issues/444
* oauth-wg/oauth-v2-1 (+1/-0/💬0)
 1 issues created:
 - Section 4.1.2.1 Error Response is unclear on how to handle an Invalid 
Authorization Endpoint request (by dfcoffin)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-v2-1/issues/184
* oauth-wg/draft-ietf-oauth-attestation-based-client-auth (+1/-0/💬1)
 1 issues created:
 - client_id optional in the request body (by Sakurann)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/draft-ietf-oauth-attestation-based-client-auth/issues/81
 1 issues received 1 new comments:
 - #71 Propose to change the draft name (1 by Sakurann)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/draft-ietf-oauth-attestation-based-client-auth/issues/71


Pull requests
-------------
* oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens (+1/-1/💬0)
 1 pull requests submitted:
 - Correct JSON example - address issue #114 (by gffletch)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/pull/116
 1 pull requests merged:
 - Correct JSON example - address issue #114
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/pull/116
* oauth-wg/draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata (+0/-1/💬0)
 1 pull requests merged:
 - Removed extraneous paragraph
https://github.com/oauth-wg/draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata/pull/46

Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-browser-based-apps
* https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-identity-chaining
* https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens
* https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc
* https://github.com/oauth-wg/draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata
* https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-cross-device-security
* https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt
* https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-v2-1
* https://github.com/oauth-wg/draft-ietf-oauth-status-list
* https://github.com/oauth-wg/draft-ietf-oauth-attestation-based-client-auth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list -- oauth@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to oauth-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to