Hi,
At IETF 120, a proposal was made to both rename the `azd` claim (because
of it's overlap with azd as defined by RAR) as well as define a way to
explicitly include a RAR object. The issue can be found here:
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/118
The proposal is to rename `azd` to `tad` (Transaction Authorization
Details) but NOT define a specific mechanism for including a RAR object
in the `tad`. Are there any current (real world) use cases where an
explicit inclusion of a RAR object would be valuable?
This or any other feedback greatly appreciated. Please provide feedback
in the issue on github.
Thanks,
George
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list -- oauth@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to oauth-le...@ietf.org
