Not sure if I have formal right to vote, will just state that we are currently using something very similar internally, and will be looking forward to adopting a standards-based approach.
BTW is there an issue tracker for this one? couldn't find links to GH etc. Thanks, Dmitry Backbase / Keycloak On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 4:40 PM Pieter Kasselman <pieter.kasselman= 40microsoft....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > I support adoption. > > > > *From:* OAuth <oauth-boun...@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *Rifaat Shekh-Yusef > *Sent:* Tuesday, November 14, 2023 12:58 PM > *To:* oauth <oauth@ietf.org> > *Subject:* [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - Transaction Tokens > > > > All, > > This is an *official *call for adoption for the *Transaction Tokens * > draft: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tulshibagwale-oauth-transaction-tokens/ > > Please, reply on the mailing list and let us know if you are in favor or > against adopting this draft as WG document, by *Nov 28th*. > > Regards, > Rifaat & Hannes > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
