>
> I also noticed you didn't mark it as replacing the individual draft in
> datatracker. You can email supp...@ietf.org and request that they mark it
> as replacing
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-looker-oauth-jwt-cwt-status-list/ so
> that the history tracks better.
>

I fixed that.

Regards,
 Rifaat


On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 10:35 AM Aaron Parecki <aa...@parecki.com> wrote:

> Tobias, Paul, Christian,
>
> I just noticed the new working group adopted version of this draft:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-status-list/
>
> I posted this comment on Github, but I'll repeat it here for others. I
> find the new name "OAuth Status List" confusing. While I understand wanting
> to remove "JWT" and "CWT" from the name, I was not aware of that discussion
> during the call for adoption. I would suggest renaming this to "OAuth Token
> Status List" instead.
>
> I also noticed you didn't mark it as replacing the individual draft in
> datatracker. You can email supp...@ietf.org and request that they mark it
> as replacing
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-looker-oauth-jwt-cwt-status-list/
> so that the history tracks better.
>
> I also noticed that there are significant changes to the draft between the
> individual and working group versions. Typically it is better to post a
> verbatim copy of the individual draft as the adopted version, and then make
> changes in a -01 version.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Aaron
>
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 5:56 AM Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <
> rifaat.s.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> Based on the feedback to this call for adoption, we declare this document
>> adopted as a WG document.
>>
>>
>> Authors,
>>
>> Please, submit this as a working group document at your earliest
>> convenience.
>>
>> Regards,
>>  Rifaat & Hannes
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 8:51 PM John Bradley <ve7...@ve7jtb.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 for adoption
>>>
>>> On Sat, Sep 30, 2023, 9:53 AM Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <
>>> rifaat.s.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> All,
>>>>
>>>> This is an official call for adoption for the *JWT and CWT Status List*
>>>> draft:
>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-looker-oauth-jwt-cwt-status-list/
>>>>
>>>> Please, reply *on the mailing list *and let us know if you are in *favor
>>>> *or* against *adopting this draft as WG document, by *Oct 13th*.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>  Rifaat & Hannes
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> OAuth mailing list
>>>> OAuth@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>> OAuth mailing list
>> OAuth@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>>
>
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to