Hi Rifaat,
Right now a browser uses either basic , NTLM, Kerberos or Negotiate
authentication to a proxy which are all old methods and not anymore appropriate
with Microsoft AD moving to Azure AD. Other methods like OAUTH might now be
more appropriate assuming enterprises still require proxy based controls at
their borders to the Internet.
Regards
Markus
From: Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2023 6:12 PM
To: Markus
Cc: oauth@ietf.org ; George Fletcher
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAUTH for Web Proxy authentication
Hi Markus,
As Goerge mentioned, there is no such document that covers this.
What use case(s) do you have in mind for this?
Regards,
Rifaat
On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 7:50 PM Markus <mar...@moeller.plus.com> wrote:
Thank you.
Regards
Markus
From: George Fletcher
Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2023 1:43 PM
To: Markus; oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAUTH for Web Proxy authentication
To my knowledge that spec doesn't exist. I'll let others chime in if they
have seen a proposal in that regard.
In regards to which working group, given the core topic is OAuth
authorization, I would present it here at a minimum.
Thanks,
George
On 1/22/23 7:06 AM, Markus PlusNet wrote:
Dear WG,
I am new to oauth and wonder which WG would be responsible for
reviewing a Spec for Proxy authentication
https://httpwg.org/specs/rfc9110.html#auth.client.proxy using oauth or does
that spec already exist ?
Thank you
Markus
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
