Thank you, Brian, for the reference: A.12 - access token syntax (RFC 6749).
That really helped.

On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 10:32 PM Brian Campbell <bcampb...@pingidentity.com>
wrote:

> No bit flipping is needed. It is just meant to say that the bytes of the
> ASCII representation of the access token value are the input to the hash
> function.  The access token value itself should only be made up of
> printable ASCII characters
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6749#appendix-A.12 BTW.
>
> The ath value in
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-oauth-dpop-11.html#figure-13
> is the hash of the access token from
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-oauth-dpop-11.html#figure-12
> if you want to check your work.
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 26, 2022 at 2:10 AM devi prasad <dpras...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> DPoP mentions the **ASCII encoding** of a token value. This appears
>> twice in the spec:
>>
>> *section 4.2. DPoP Proof JWT Syntax*...
>> ath: hash of the access token. The value MUST be the result of a
>> base64url encoding (as defined in Section 2 of [RFC7515]) the SHA-256 [SHS]
>> hash of the ASCII encoding of the associated access token's value.
>> and
>> *section 12.7. JSON Web Token Claims Registration*
>> ...
>> Access token hash:
>> ...
>> Claim Description: The base64url encoded SHA-256 hash of the ASCII
>> encoding of the associated access token's value.
>> I'm trying to develop a bunch of test cases, and would like to know the
>> meaning more precisely.
>>
>> Does ASCII encoding mean that the algorithm should
>> (1) treat the access token's value as an array(or a sequence) of unsigned
>> bytes, and
>> (2) clear the most-significant-bit (MSB) of each byte in the array.
>> (3) calculate SHA-256 of the byte array obtained in step 2.
>> (4) calculate the base64url encoding of the bytes obtained in step 3.
>>
>> Is this the correct interpretation? Especially the step 2 that clears the
>> MSB of each byte?
>> (I'm not assuming tokens to be JWTs; intend to support proprietary token
>> representations and opaque tokens).
>>
>> Thank you!
>> Devi Prasad
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OAuth mailing list
>> OAuth@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>>
>
> *CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and
> privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any
> review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited.
> If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender
> immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any file attachments from
> your computer. Thank you.*
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to