In section 5, the example access token requests are missing either the
client_id parameter in the POST body or the client authentication in the
HTTP header.

https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-oauth-dpop-11.html#section-5

Given that DPoP is primarily targeted at public clients, I would recommend
adding the client_id parameter to the POST body in the example. This goes
for both the authorization_code grant as well as the refresh_token grant.

I believe this is a purely editorial change since DPoP doesn't change any
requirements about client authentication or the client_id parameter.

---
Aaron Parecki
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to