Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-oauth-rar-19: Yes

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to 
https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-rar/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks to Carl Wallace for his SECDIR review, please see his comments:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-oauth-rar-15-secdir-lc-wallace-2022-11-16/

Thanks to Robert Sparks for his GENART review, please see his comments:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-oauth-rar-15-genart-lc-sparks-2022-11-17/


I find the geolocation example confusing. Is it giving access to photos taken 
in the
geolocation or is it giving access to anyone residing in that geolocation?

Section 6.1:

        The AS would compare the type value and the action value to
        determine that the read access is already covered by the write
        access previously granted to the client.

I see some ambiguity here if there is a list of 3 requests. If we start out 
with asking
for "write" and received it, and it implies "read", and then a new request 
comes in to ask
for "read", that is clear. The "write" access is dropped. But what if we ask 
for "write" now?
A previous request did give us that, but we dropped the capability and are no 
re-asking it
again. Should this be allowed or not? Can the document give more guidance on 
this?

Section 10

Why "authorization_details_types" and not 
"authorization_details_types_requests" to
ensure there is no confusion with authorization_details_types_supported ?

(I guess a bit too late to change name now, as it seems this is already 
deployed)



_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to