As Nat and others have mentioned, JWT itself <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc7519/> is a product of this WG. While JWT had applications in OAuth, it was developed as a more general purpose token format and has seen widespread usage. Working on a general purpose selective disclosure mechanism for JWT in this WG seems appropriate considering that history.
On Sun, Aug 7, 2022 at 8:53 AM Nat Sakimura <sakim...@gmail.com> wrote: > I support the adoption of SD-JWT. This is a natural and important > extension to JWT which is a product of this WG and meets some of the > use-cases that we left out years ago with relatively simple cryptographic > techniques. > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 9:17 AM Rifaat Shekh-Yusef < > rifaat.s.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> All, >> >> This is a call for adoption for the *SD-JWT* document >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fett-oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt/ >> >> Please, provide your feedback on the mailing list by *August 12th*. >> >> Regards, >> Rifaat & Hannes >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OAuth mailing list >> OAuth@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >> > > > -- > Nat Sakimura (=nat) > Chairman, OpenID Foundation > http://nat.sakimura.org/ > @_nat_en > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > -- _CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any file attachments from your computer. Thank you._
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
