Yes, we submitted both the .xml and .txt files. It does sound like a tooling
issue. I'm sure the RFC Editor will sort it out before publication.
Thanks again,
-- Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: Lars Eggert <l...@eggert.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2022 12:09 AM
To: Kristina Yasuda <kristina.yas...@microsoft.com>
Cc: The IESG <i...@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-oauth-jwk-thumbprint-...@ietf.org;
oauth-cha...@ietf.org; oauth@ietf.org; rifaat.s.i...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Lars Eggert's No Objection on
draft-ietf-oauth-jwk-thumbprint-uri-02: (with COMMENT)
Hi,
On 2022-6-2, at 5:22, Kristina Yasuda <kristina.yas...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> Regarding your reference to the Simplified BSD License, could you please
> clarify what you meant since
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-oauth-jwk-thumbprint-uri-02.html
> does refer to the Revised BSD License? There doesn't seem to be a problem in
> that regard.
I reviewed the text version at
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-oauth-jwk-thumbprint-uri-02.txt and
that does refer to the simplified BSD license. (Same for -03.)
This looks like a tooling issue. Did you submit XML (only) to the datatracker
when you submitted -03?
Thanks,
Lars
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
