Needless to say, but as the author of both this draft and the draft that it would replace, I am in favor of adoption of this document. There are still a lot of open questions to answer — such as key introduction and management practices — and I think there is a lot of power in the intersection of the OAuth and HTTPSig spaces.
— Justin > On Jul 16, 2021, at 12:31 PM, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.s.i...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > All, > > This is a call for adoption for the OAuth Proof of Possession Tokens with > HTTP Message Signatures draft as a WG document: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-richer-oauth-httpsig/ > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-richer-oauth-httpsig/> > > Please, provide your feedback on the mailing list by July 30th. > > Regards, > Rifaat & Hannes > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
