https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-oauth-v2-1-00.html#name-authorization-code-grant
Can we avoid using (1, 2, 3) on the left side of the diagram to describe, I'm not even sure what they are supposed to represent, not to mention the RO in the diagram doesn't really provide value (for me) relevant to the code grant flow. It's confusing to see these numerical identifiers twice in the same picture. But maybe there is something hidden in this that I'm missing, still 3a and 3b could be used to identify different legs of the same code path. [image: image.png] *Warren Parad* Secure your user data and complete your authorization architecture. Implement Authress <https://bit.ly/37SSO1p>. <https://rhosys.ch>
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
