Hi all!

I am reading through this document for the first time. I am mainly
looking at it in comparison to OAuth 2.0 (RFC 6749) and with the eyes
of a developer. I am trying to understand where phrases have changed
and, of course, where features are changing.

What is the best way to provide feedback? In this mailing list?

Thanks,
Sascha

On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 at 09:44, Dick Hardt <dick.ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Aaron, Torsten, and I -- with some help from Daniel -- have created a new 
> version of draft-pareck-oauth-v2-1. I think we are ready for a WG adoption 
> call (assuming the updated charter).
>
> Here is the doc:
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-parecki-oauth-v2-1-03
>
> Here is a link to the diff from -02:
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-parecki-oauth-v2-1-03.txt
>
> This version incorporates feedback from the WG, as well as editorial changes 
> to improve readability. Highlights:
>
> - Appendix of current known extensions, and references to the Appendix so 
> that readers become aware of related work.
>
> - defined new client type - credentialed clients - a client that has 
> credentials, but the AS has not confirmed the identity of the client. 
> Confidential clients have had their identity confirmed by the AS. We talked 
> about changing the names of confidential and public, but thought that would 
> be confusing. This new definition cleans up the text substantially.
>
> - consistent use of redirect URI rather than mixing in redirect endpoint URI 
> and redirect endpoint.
>
> - adopted new language on when PKCE is required.
>
> - removed IANA section (nothing new is in 2.1)
>
> / Dick
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to