Thanks for the quick check. I updated the draft.
Also, Mike Jones pointed me that  It MUST also reject the request if the
request object uses "alg":"none". needs to be added, so I did.

On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 2:30 AM Tangui Le Pense <tangui.lepense=
40mail...@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> There seems to be a typo:
>
> 9.2 and 9.3: "require_signed_request_objects"
>
> 10.5: "require_signed_request_object"
>
> Regards,
>
> --
>
> Tangui
>
> 01.07.2020 16:14, internet-dra...@ietf.org пишет:
> > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> > This draft is a work item of the Web Authorization Protocol WG of the
> IETF.
> >
> >          Title           : The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework: JWT
> Secured Authorization Request (JAR)
> >          Authors         : Nat Sakimura
> >                            John Bradley
> >       Filename        : draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-24.txt
> >       Pages           : 33
> >       Date            : 2020-07-01
> >
> > Abstract:
> >     The authorization request in OAuth 2.0 described in RFC 6749 utilizes
> >     query parameter serialization, which means that Authorization Request
> >     parameters are encoded in the URI of the request and sent through
> >     user agents such as web browsers.  While it is easy to implement, it
> >     means that (a) the communication through the user agents are not
> >     integrity protected and thus the parameters can be tainted, and (b)
> >     the source of the communication is not authenticated.  Because of
> >     these weaknesses, several attacks to the protocol have now been put
> >     forward.
> >
> >     This document introduces the ability to send request parameters in a
> >     JSON Web Token (JWT) instead, which allows the request to be signed
> >     with JSON Web Signature (JWS) and encrypted with JSON Web Encryption
> >     (JWE) so that the integrity, source authentication and
> >     confidentiality property of the Authorization Request is attained.
> >     The request can be sent by value or by reference.
> >
> >
> > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq/
> >
> > There are also htmlized versions available at:
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-24
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-24
> >
> > A diff from the previous version is available at:
> > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-24
> >
> >
> > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
> > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> >
> > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OAuth mailing list
> > OAuth@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>


-- 
Nat Sakimura (=nat)
Chairman, OpenID Foundation
http://nat.sakimura.org/
@_nat_en
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to