> -----Original Message-----
> From: iesg <iesg-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Benjamin Kaduk
> Sent: 31 May 2020 05:09
> To: Pete Resnick <resn...@episteme.net>
> Cc: m...@microsoft.com; i...@ietf.org; ve7...@ve7jtb.com;
> hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net; oauth@ietf.org; RFC Errata System <rfc-
> edi...@rfc-editor.org>
> Subject: Re: [Errata Verified] RFC7800 (6187)
>
> The new text is clearly the right thing, and there is no need
> to debate it if/when the document gets updated. "Don't hold
> it; do it now", so to speak -- and noting that (my
> understanding/recollection of) the plan for
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/inline-errata/rfc7800.html is that only
> verified errata, not those in other states, will be displayed.
[RW]
If this ends up being the plan, then I think that we may wish to modify the RFC
guidance, or possibly have two different verified states:
(i) Verified, could impact implementations
(ii) Verified, editorial only.
Certainly, it seems to be makes sense for these sorts of errata to be displayed.
Regards,
Rob
>
> (Yes, that link 404s at the moment, I assume a caching issue.)
>
> -Ben
>
> On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 10:55:01PM -0500, Pete Resnick wrote:
> > "Verified", not "Hold For Document Update"?
> >
> > pr
> >
> > On 30 May 2020, at 20:34, RFC Errata System wrote:
> >
> > > The following errata report has been verified for RFC7800,
> > > "Proof-of-Possession Key Semantics for JSON Web Tokens (JWTs)".
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------
> > > You may review the report below and at:
> > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6187
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------
> > > Status: Verified
> > > Type: Editorial
> > >
> > > Reported by: Pete Resnick <resn...@episteme.net>
> > > Date Reported: 2020-05-26
> > > Verified by: Benjamin Kaduk (IESG)
> > >
> > > Section: 7.1
> > >
> > > Original Text
> > > -------------
> > > [JWK] Jones, M., "JSON Web Key (JWK)", RFC 7517,
> > > DOI 10.17487/RFC7157, May 2015,
> > > <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7517>.
> > >
> > >
> > > Corrected Text
> > > --------------
> > > [JWK] Jones, M., "JSON Web Key (JWK)", RFC 7517,
> > > DOI 10.17487/RFC7517, May 2015,
> > > <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7517>.
> > >
> > >
> > > Notes
> > > -----
> > > DOI has a typo: 7157 instead of 7517.
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------
> > > RFC7800 (draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession-11)
> > > --------------------------------------
> > > Title : Proof-of-Possession Key Semantics for JSON Web
> > > Tokens (JWTs)
> > > Publication Date : April 2016
> > > Author(s) : M. Jones, J. Bradley, H. Tschofenig
> > > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD
> > > Source : Web Authorization Protocol
> > > Area : Security
> > > Stream : IETF
> > > Verifying Party : IESG
> >
> >
> > --
> > Pete Resnick https://www.episteme.net/
> > All connections to the world are tenuous at best
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
