Hi, assuming WG adoption of DPoP does not depend on the virtual interim, I’m fine with the proposal.
best regards, Torsten. > On 26. Mar 2020, at 21:03, Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofe...@arm.com> > wrote: > > Hi all, > > Rifaat and I had a chat about the virtual interim meetings. > We decided to schedule 6 one-hour-long sessions with 2 topics per session. > > Here is the list of topics we want to discuss: > > 1) OAuth Security Topics + Browser-Based Apps > > 2) JSON Web Token (JWT) Profile for OAuth 2.0 Access Tokens + Nested JWT > > 3) PAR + RAR > > 4) OAuth 2.1 + JWT Response for OAuth Token Introspection > > 5) DPoP + OAuth 2.0 Incremental Authorization > > 6) Client Intermediary Metadata + Reciprocal OAuth > > We were thinking about using our Monday, 12:00 EDT, office hour timeslot. > Proposed starting date is April 6th. > > Would this be acceptable? > > Ciao > Hannes & Rifaat > IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are > confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended > recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the > contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the > information in any medium. Thank you. > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
