This errata is correct. Thanks for bringing this to our attention!
> On 24. Jan 2020, at 01:14, RFC Errata System <rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org> > wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6819, > "OAuth 2.0 Threat Model and Security Considerations". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5965 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: David Piggott <david.pigg...@disneystreaming.com> > > Section: 4.4.1.2 > > Original Text > ------------- > Store access token hashes only (Section 5.1.4.1.3). > > Corrected Text > -------------- > Store authorization code hashes only (Section 5.1.4.1.3). > > Notes > ----- > > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC6819 (draft-ietf-oauth-v2-threatmodel-08) > -------------------------------------- > Title : OAuth 2.0 Threat Model and Security Considerations > Publication Date : January 2013 > Author(s) : T. Lodderstedt, Ed., M. McGloin, P. Hunt > Category : INFORMATIONAL > Source : Web Authorization Protocol > Area : Security > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
