Hi! Draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-17 is currently in "Approved-announcement to be sent::Revised I-D Needed". I reviewed the Feb-2017 ballot and see that everything appears to have been addressed but:
** Mirja: "Should this document maybe update rfc6749?" -- I saw no response on this item. What is the thinking? As I inherited this draft, I also conducted a review and have no substantive comments. I'd ask that the authors do a minor rev to address the following editorial nits so that I can advance the draft. (1) Section 5.2 s/RFC 7230 [RFC7230] ./ RFC 7230 [RFC7230]./ (2) Section 5.2.1 s/Requiest/Request/ (3) Section 7. s/OAuth 2.0 [RFC6749] ./OAuth 2.0 [RFC6749]./ (4) Section 10.3 s/sited/cited/ Thanks for you work on the draft. Roman _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
