Hey Benjamin, Of course I agree that sheer headcount isn’t the main factor :). The main point here is that this is a profile meant to promote and facilitate interoperability, so _as long as a proposal is is sound & secure_, the number of products and services favoring it does have direct impact on adoption & expectations of successful interop. I agree that the “why” remains the highest order bit, and as you mentioned we have seen good arguments.
On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 02:15 Benjamin Kaduk <ka...@mit.edu> wrote: > Hi Vittorio, > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 09:48:08AM -0700, Vittorio Bertocci wrote: > > thank you Steinar and everyone else for the comments on this! > > To summarize the situation so far: Dominick, Steinar, Rob, David, Nov, > > Bertrand recommend using sub only for users. Martin would like to have > the > > sub for app only flows as well. Hans is neutral. > > That does sound like the sub as user has more consensus, tho before > > changing it I'd wait for the people currently at IETF104 to have more > time > > to comment as well. > > I'm not the responsible AD for OAuth, but as irresponsible AD let me point > out that the WG chairs need to look at the "why" and not just the headcount > of support, when they determine what has consensus (or lack of consensus).. > But I think we have seen some good arguments presented in this thread, so > hopefully the chairs' job will not be very difficult. > > -Ben >
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
