Since the authors of the token exchange draft have asked IANA for an early 
registration of the parameters I get the impression that the question is more “ 
does the resource indicator spec need to define the resource parameter (or 
rather reference the resource and audience parameters from the token exchange 
spec)”?

From: Filip Skokan <panva...@gmail.com>
Sent: Donnerstag, 7. Februar 2019 16:38
To: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofe...@arm.com>
Cc: a...@ietf.org; oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Resource, Audience, and req_aud

To add to that,

3. If a device uses HTTP Token Exchange it can use both resource and audience 
parameters.

With the recent discussion and changes to the language in the resource 
indicators draft, does the token exchange spec need a unique audience parameter?

S pozdravem,
Filip Skokan


On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 at 16:25, Hannes Tschofenig 
<hannes.tschofe...@arm.com<mailto:hannes.tschofe...@arm.com>> wrote:
Hi all,

after re-reading token exchange, the resource indicator, and the 
ace-oauth-params drafts I am wondering whether it is really necessary to have 
different functionality in ACE vs. in OAuth for basic parameters.

Imagine I use an Authorization Server and I support devices that use CoAP and 
HTTP.


  1.  If a device uses CoAP then it has to use the req_aud parameter to 
indicate to the authorization server that it wants to talk to a specific 
resource server. It would either put a URI or a logical name there.
  2.  If a device uses HTTP then it has to use either the resource parameter to 
indicate to the authorization server that it wants to talk to a resource 
server, which is identified using a URI, or the audience parameter, if it uses 
a logical name.

Ciao
Hannes



IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are 
confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, 
please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any 
other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any 
medium. Thank you.
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org<mailto:OAuth@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are 
confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, 
please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any 
other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any 
medium. Thank you.
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to