While I agree that a single requested resource is the common case, enough 
people have spoken up with a need for multiple requested resources over the 
years that I think everyone will be better served by leaving the ability to 
specify multiple requested resources in the specification.

                                                       -- Mike

From: OAuth <oauth-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Brian Campbell
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2018 10:18 AM
To: Filip Skokan <panva...@gmail.com>
Cc: oauth <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption for "Resource Indicators for OAuth 
2.0"

The current draft does allow multiple "resource" parameters. However, there 
seemed to be consensus in the WG meeting yesterday that only a single 
"resource" parameter was preferable and that a client could obtain an access 
token per resource (likely using a refresh token). I'm personally sympathetic 
to that point. But maybe it's too restrictive. I would like to see some more 
text about the complexity implications of multiple "resource" parameters and 
perhaps some discouragement of doing so. I believe logical names are more 
potentially useful in an STS framework like token exchange but should be out of 
scope for this work.







On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 3:43 AM, Filip Skokan 
<panva...@gmail.com<mailto:panva...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Torsten,

> Multiple "resource" parameters may be used to indicate that the issued token 
> is intended to be used at multiple resource servers.

That's already in. Furthermore what about logical names for target services? 
Like was added in -03 of token exchange?

Best,
Filip Skokan


On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 9:33 AM Torsten Lodderstedt 
<tors...@lodderstedt.net<mailto:tors...@lodderstedt.net>> wrote:
I support adoption of this document.

I would like to point out (again) a single resource is not sufficient for most 
use cases I implemented in the last couple if years. I‘m advocating for 
enhancing the draft to support multiple resources and a clear definition of the 
relationship between resource(s) and scope.

Am 20.07.2018 um 08:20 schrieb n-sakimura 
<n-sakim...@nri.co.jp<mailto:n-sakim...@nri.co.jp>>:
+1

From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian Campbell
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2018 7:42 AM
To: Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.i...@gmail.com<mailto:rifaat.i...@gmail.com>>
Cc: oauth <oauth@ietf.org<mailto:oauth@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption for "Resource Indicators for OAuth 
2.0"

I support adoption of this document.

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 4:01 PM, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef 
<rifaat.i...@gmail.com<mailto:rifaat.i...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi all,

This is the call for adoption of the 'Resource Indicators for OAuth 2.0' 
document
following the positive call for adoption at the Montreal IETF meeting.

Here is the document:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-campbell-oauth-resource-indicators-02

Please let us know by August 2nd whether you accept / object to the
adoption of this document as a starting point for work in the OAuth
working group.

Regards,
Rifaat

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org<mailto:OAuth@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged 
material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, 
distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited..  If you have 
received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by 
e-mail and delete the message and any file attachments from your computer. 
Thank you.
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org<mailto:OAuth@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org<mailto:OAuth@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org<mailto:OAuth@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged 
material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, 
distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited..  If you have 
received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by 
e-mail and delete the message and any file attachments from your computer. 
Thank you.
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to