Hi Hannes, The draft is interesting, but it looks a bit like NEA. How would this vary, apart from the CoAP part and a different registry? Seems to me the real magic is how the device is interrogated such that the consumer of this information has confidence as to its validity. The protocol bits are the easy part. If people have some understanding of that magic and are willing to share, then this work becomes considerably more interesting.
Eliot On 21.06.18 17:11, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I would like to make you aware of work that will be discussed on > attestation on the EAT mailing list. Here is the link to the list: > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eat > > > > Here is a document describing the idea: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mandyam-eat-00 > > > > The work is relevant for IoT and non-IoT devices. > > > > Laurence and I are planning to organize a Bar BOF at the Montreal IETF > meeting to entertain the idea. > > > > Ciao > > Hannes > > IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are > confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended > recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose > the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or > copy the information in any medium. Thank you. > > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
