+1 Vladimir
PS: Am I correct that the current token exchange spec can be used with mTLS and token binding as it is, without any additional changes? On 03/10/17 16:51, Mike Jones wrote: > A Microsoft use case has come up in which people would like to perform a > token exchange for a SAML token. The spec already defines > urn:ietf:params:oauth:token-type:jwt for requesting JWT tokens. Would > anybody object to us adding urn:ietf:params:oauth:token-type:saml2 to the > next draft to also give us a standard way to ask for SAML 2.0 tokens? > > It could always be done in its own spec, but adding it in Token Exchange > seems more expedient. > > -- Mike
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
