I would like to see us proceed with the symmetric PoP work in Oauth WG and stop the HTTP Signing work all together
From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian Campbell Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 12:54 PM To: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net> Cc: oauth@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Future of PoP Work In my opinion, at this time, the OAuth WG should not proceed with the symmetric implementation of PoP and should not continue work on HTTP signing. On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net<mailto:hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net>> wrote: Hi all, two questions surfaced at the last IETF meeting, namely 1) Do we want to proceed with the symmetric implementation of PoP or, alternatively, do we want to move it over to the ACE working group? 2) Do we want to continue the work on HTTP signing? We would appreciate your input on these two questions. Ciao Hannes & Derek _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org<mailto:OAuth@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Foauth&data=02%7C01%7Ctonynad%40microsoft.com%7C98fbf7a5c8ba43e87da508d3f859be52%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636125036740748315&sdata=wmmgZVRaG%2FNEj2rEJaGjkNuBuFPp5uADFP0aPnprNSA%3D&reserved=0>
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
