We can also call it the “COSE Token”. As a chair of the COSE working group, I’m fine with that amount of co-branding.
— Justin > On May 9, 2016, at 9:31 AM, Carsten Bormann <c...@tzi.org> wrote: > >> draft-ietf-ace-cbor-token-00.txt; > > For the record, I do not think that ACE has a claim on the term "CBOR > Token". While the term token is not used in RFC 7049, there are many > tokens that could be expressed in CBOR or be used in applying CBOR to a > problem. > > ACE CBOR Token is fine, though. > (Or, better, CBOR ACE Token, CAT.) > > Grüße, Carsten > > _______________________________________________ > COSE mailing list > c...@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
