+1 to Prateek's comments

-- Dick

> On Apr 7, 2016, at 8:24 PM, Prateek Mishra <prateek.mis...@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> While this work addresses a gap in the existing OAuth specification set, I am 
> very concerned that this
> incremental extension will lead to even more confusion around the areas of 
> “scope”, “audience” and “resource server”.
> 
> I think we should try to solve this problem via  a framework that provides 
> better guidance and implementation
> models for OAuth use-cases. In other words, I feel that a broader discussion 
> is needed here.
> 
> 
>> On Apr 7, 2016, at 4:11 PM, Justin Richer <jric...@mit.edu> wrote:
>> 
>> I support adoption of this document as a starting point for working group 
>> work.
>> 
>> — Justin
>> 
>> 
>>> On Apr 6, 2016, at 1:25 PM, Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> this is the call for adoption of 'Resource Indicators for OAuth 2.0', see
>>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-campbell-oauth-resource-indicators/
>>> 
>>> Please let us know by April 20th whether you accept / object to the
>>> adoption of this document as a starting point for work in the OAuth
>>> working group.
>>> 
>>> Note: If you already stated your opinion at the IETF meeting in Buenos
>>> Aires then you don't need to re-state your opinion, if you want.
>>> 
>>> The feedback at the BA IETF meeting was the following: ~10 persons
>>> for accepting the document and 0 persons against.
>>> 
>>> Ciao
>>> Hannes & Derek
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OAuth mailing list
>>> OAuth@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> OAuth mailing list
>> OAuth@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to