Phil,

we have discussed this concept already for years. In fact, it dates back
to the days of the OAuth base specification and the security
consideration section even talks about it.

We have had the content of this in the PoP key distribution draft and we
are now moving it into a separate document.

I am not sure how much longer you want to discuss it.

Ciao
Hannes


On 04/06/2016 08:07 PM, Phil Hunt (IDM) wrote:
> I would like to have more discussion before wg adoption. 
> 
> I support the work and am willing to help. 
> 
> Phil
> 
>> On Apr 6, 2016, at 14:25, Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net> 
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> this is the call for adoption of 'Resource Indicators for OAuth 2.0', see
>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-campbell-oauth-resource-indicators/
>>
>> Please let us know by April 20th whether you accept / object to the
>> adoption of this document as a starting point for work in the OAuth
>> working group.
>>
>> Note: If you already stated your opinion at the IETF meeting in Buenos
>> Aires then you don't need to re-state your opinion, if you want.
>>
>> The feedback at the BA IETF meeting was the following: ~10 persons
>> for accepting the document and 0 persons against.
>>
>> Ciao
>> Hannes & Derek
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OAuth mailing list
>> OAuth@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to