I think the service discovery document (describing all the endpoints and
features of the AS) is a valid starting point. That's basically how we
use the OIDC discovery in the OAuth context today at DT. We refer
partners to the openid-configuration document. Putting the data relevant
to OAuth under .well_known/oauth would be more reasonable from a OAuth
developer's perspective (in my opinion).
We still have to learn, how clients really discover the location of this
discovery document. We can come up with extensions for user id/resource
service data based discovery at any time, if we
kind regards,
Torsten.
Am 05.02.2016 um 01:34 schrieb Justin Richer:
+1, if we define a webfinger/rel at all.
I would rather we just define the service discovery document, the thing that
lives under .well-known.
— Justin
On Feb 4, 2016, at 4:01 AM, Roland Hedberg <roland.hedb...@umu.se> wrote:
+1
4 feb 2016 kl. 08:10 skrev Phil Hunt <phil.h...@oracle.com>:
+1 for adoption.
However I would like a rel value distinct from OpenID (see separate email).
While the mechanics of discovery is the same, I believe some clients will want
to distinguish between OAuth AS’s and OIDC OPs. Further, I would expect over
time that different discovery features may be required. Locking them together
seems like a pre-mature or rush choice.
Phil
@independentid
www.independentid.com
phil.h...@oracle.com
On Feb 3, 2016, at 10:44 PM, William Denniss <wdenn...@google.com> wrote:
+1 for adoption of this document by the working group
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 10:27 PM, Mike Jones <michael.jo...@microsoft.com> wrote:
I support adoption of this document by the working group. I'll note that
elements of this specification are already in production use by multiple
parties.
-- Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Hannes Tschofenig
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 3:49 AM
To: oauth@ietf.org
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Discovery
Hi all,
this is the call for adoption of OAuth 2.0 Discovery, see
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-oauth-discovery-00
Please let us know by Feb 2nd whether you accept / object to the adoption of
this document as a starting point for work in the OAuth working group.
Note: If you already stated your opinion at the IETF meeting in Yokohama then
you don't need to re-state your opinion, if you want.
The feedback at the Yokohama IETF meeting was the following: 19 for / zero
against / 4 persons need more information.
Ciao
Hannes & Derek
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
