Hi all, On January 19th I posted a call for adoption of the 'Encoding claims in the OAuth 2 state parameter using a JWT' and of the 'Stateless Client Identifier for OAuth 2' specifications, see http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg15406.html http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg15407.html
Only Mike and John responded to the call on the mailing list. The lack of feedback may indicate that this is not important or that the value of the document has not been understood. Maybe there have also been too many other items on the plate (and given the list traffic I have seen in the last few weeks on the OAuth list this wouldn't be such a far-fetched thought). Given the feedback I have received privately I have a hard time to believe that there is no interest in these two items. Here is what we will do: we will talk to the document authors in an attempt to reposition the documents (and maybe change title, abstract and intro). Then, we will come back to the group to gauge the reaction. Ciao Hannes & Derek
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
