Brian, thanks for your review. This is supposed to be the “authorization server” (that’s a typo), which is where the introspection endpoint is almost always hosted.
— Justin > On Jun 10, 2015, at 7:12 AM, Brian Haberman <br...@innovationslab.net> wrote: > > Brian Haberman has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-oauth-introspection-09: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-introspection/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > * In Section 2.1... is the authorization service and the introspection > endpoint the same device? > > _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
