Hi Justin

IMHO the section 2.1 [1] requires more work.

First, "resource_id". Having such a parameter does not add anything to the interoperability side of the spec. It is a "server specific string..." which may be anything and as such a 3rd party AS is unlikely to do any work around this parameter unless both RS and AS are from the same provider. IMHO it either has to be dropped, the text "The endpoint MAY allow other parameters to provide further context to the query" covers whatever else that server may want to add or attach some more specific meaning to it. Besides that, the MUST authentication requirement covers properly a possible RS identification requirement. I'd rather have a "resource_id" representing an RS base address or better, a current request URI, which in combination with an optional client_ip can help AS to make a more specific introspection action.

I also suggested to promote a parameter like "client_ip". Just referring to a possibility of RS reporting a client IP adress does not help improving the interoperability either with respect to RS and AS offered by different providers working with a client IP property

Thanks, Sergey



[1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-introspection-03#section-2.1



On 07/12/14 03:38, Justin Richer wrote:
… and I just noticed hanging text at the top of section 2.2 due to the JWT 
claims edit. My working copy has removed the extraneous text “Several of these”.

Also, as always, latest XML is up on GitHub:

https://github.com/jricher/oauth-spec

— Justin
On Dec 6, 2014, at 10:34 PM, Justin Richer <jric...@mit.edu> wrote:

Small update to introspection, now the returned values reference the JWT claims 
specifically (as requested). Also updated the HTTP and HTML references.

No normative changes.

— Justin

On Dec 6, 2014, at 10:32 PM, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Web Authorization Protocol Working Group of 
the IETF.

       Title           : OAuth 2.0 Token Introspection
       Author          : Justin Richer
        Filename        : draft-ietf-oauth-introspection-03.txt
        Pages           : 12
        Date            : 2014-12-06

Abstract:
  This specification defines a method for a protected resource to query
  an OAuth 2.0 authorization server to determine the active state of an
  OAuth 2.0 token and to determine meta-information about this token.
  OAuth 2.0 deployments can use this method to convey information about
  the authorization context of the token from the authorization server
  to the protected resource.



The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-introspection/

There's also a htmlized version available at:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-introspection-03

A diff from the previous version is available at:
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-oauth-introspection-03


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth



_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth


_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to