Re-adding the working group to the thread... > -----Original Message----- > From: barryle...@gmail.com [mailto:barryle...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Barry > Leiba > Sent: Monday, October 13, 2014 7:59 AM > To: Brian Campbell > Cc: Benoit Claise; The IESG; oauth-cha...@tools.ietf.org; draft-ietf-oauth- > saml2-bea...@tools.ietf.org; Tom Taylor > Subject: Re: Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer-21: > (with > DISCUSS and COMMENT) > > > I don't think it's been raised but the same situation with 6755 is in > > draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer-10 too. I assume a parallel change there > > is desirable? > > Yes. > > The reason we make documents such as 6755 Informational is that they only > specify a template and procedure, and have nothing substantive that would > need to be referred to normatively. > > Barry
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
