+1
/thomas/ _______________________________________ On Sep 11, 2014, at 1:10, "Torsten Lodderstedt" <tors...@lodderstedt.net<mailto:tors...@lodderstedt.net>> wrote: +1 -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -------- Von: John Bradley Datum:11.09.2014 02:22 (GMT+01:00) An: Mike Jones Cc: oauth@ietf.org<mailto:oauth@ietf.org> Betreff: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Client Registration Management Protocol: Next Steps? +1 Sent from my iPhone On Sep 10, 2014, at 9:07 PM, Mike Jones <michael.jo...@microsoft.com<mailto:michael.jo...@microsoft.com>> wrote: +1 This gets it off the working group’s plate and lets us gather data about whether this useful or not and whether it’s right or whether changes are needed, based on actual usage experience. From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Justin Richer Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 5:05 PM To: Hannes Tschofenig; oauth@ietf.org<mailto:oauth@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Client Registration Management Protocol: Next Steps? a) Publish it as experimental. There was reasonable support for this in both Toronto and London. -- Justin On 9/10/2014 7:50 PM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: Hi all, in response to the discussions at the last IETF meeting the authors of the "Dynamic Client Registration Management Protocol"<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-management-05havechangedthedocumenttypeto> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-management-05 have<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-management-05havechangedthedocumenttypeto> changed the document type to "<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-management-05havechangedthedocumenttypeto>Experimental". We need to make a decision about the next steps for the document and we see the following options: a) Publish it as an experimental RFC b) Remove it from the working group and ask an AD to shepherd it c) Remove it from the working group and let the authors publish it via the independent submission track. In any case it would be nice to let folks play around with it and then, after some time, come back to determine whether there is enough interest to produce a standard. Please let us know what you think! Ciao Hannes & Derek _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org<mailto:OAuth@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org<mailto:OAuth@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org<mailto:OAuth@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
