I'm confused too. There hadn't been any discussion of any of the new documents going to last call that I can remember, either in Toronto, or on the list.
-----Original Message----- From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of John Bradley Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 12:47 PM To: Phil Hunt Cc: oauth@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Working Group Last Call on "Symmetric Proof of Possession for the OAuth Authorization Code Grant" Yes, I haden't anticipated going to last call right after being adopted as a WG document. Is this some procedural thing that I am unaware of? John B. On Aug 26, 2014, at 3:39 PM, Phil Hunt <phil.h...@oracle.com> wrote: > I am confused. We hummed to adopt the document not to go to last call. > > Phil > > @independentid > www.independentid.com > phil.h...@oracle.com > > > > On Aug 26, 2014, at 12:32 PM, Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net> > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> This is a Last Call for comments on the "Symmetric Proof of >> Possession for the OAuth Authorization Code Grant" specification. >> >> The document can be found here: >> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-spop/ >> >> Please have your comments in no later than September 9th. >> >> Ciao >> Hannes & Derek >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OAuth mailing list >> OAuth@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
