FYI, this report has been removed because it was junk. RFC Editor/ar
On Jun 24, 2014, at 2:56 PM, RFC Errata System wrote: > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6749, > "The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6749&eid=4024 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: Ebrahim Jodeiri dallalan <el3ra...@yahoo.com> > > Section: s > > Original Text > ------------- > s > > Corrected Text > -------------- > s > > Notes > ----- > s > > Instructions: > ------------- > This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC6749 (draft-ietf-oauth-v2-31) > -------------------------------------- > Title : The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework > Publication Date : October 2012 > Author(s) : D. Hardt, Ed. > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Web Authorization Protocol > Area : Security > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
