To me the fundamental question of whether a client has to be registered in each
place it is used is quite significant. We don't address the problem and have
not discussed it enough.
-bill
On Friday, April 4, 2014 11:39 PM, Torsten Lodderstedt
<tors...@lodderstedt.net> wrote:
Hi Bill,
which scalability problem are you referring to? As far as I remember there were
issues around the management API but not the core protocol.
regards,
Torsten.
Am 04.04.2014 um 18:41 schrieb Bill Mills <wmills_92...@yahoo.com>:
Given the fundamental scalability problem we discussed in London do we really
feel we're ready?
>On Friday, April 4, 2014 3:07 AM, Hannes Tschofenig
><hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net> wrote:
>
>Hi all,
>
>This is a Last Call for comments on the dynamic client registration
>documents:
>
>* OAuth 2.0 Dynamic Client Registration Core Protocol
>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-16
>
>* OAuth 2.0 Dynamic Client Registration Metadata
>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-metadata-00
>
>Since we have to do the last call for these two documents together we
>are setting the call for **3 weeks**.
>
>Please have your comments in no later than April 25th.
>
>Ciao
>Hannes & Derek
>
>_______________________________________________
>OAuth mailing list
>OAuth@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
>OAuth mailing list
>OAuth@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
