Hi all, Charles is right. This reference should be corrected.
Regards, Torsten. RFC Errata System <rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org> schrieb: >The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7009, >"OAuth 2.0 Token Revocation". > >-------------------------------------- >You may review the report below and at: >http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7009&eid=3808 > >-------------------------------------- >Type: Editorial >Reported by: Charles MARAIS <charles.mar...@orange.com> > >Section: 2.1 > >Original Text >------------- >The link concerning the description of the client authentication > >(Section 2.3) is : > >http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7009#section-2.3 > >Corrected Text >-------------- >The link concerning the description of the client authentication > >(Section 2.3) should be : > >http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6749#section-2.3 > >Notes >----- >In fact the pointed document is not the right one. > >Instructions: >------------- >This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please >use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or >rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) >can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > >-------------------------------------- >RFC7009 (draft-ietf-oauth-revocation-11) >-------------------------------------- >Title : OAuth 2.0 Token Revocation >Publication Date : August 2013 >Author(s) : T. Lodderstedt, Ed., S. Dronia, M. Scurtescu >Category : PROPOSED STANDARD >Source : Web Authorization Protocol >Area : Security >Stream : IETF >Verifying Party : IESG
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
