For what it's worth, the latest public dynamic registration working group draft 
has software_id and software_version fields to allow statements to be made 
about the fixed client software releases that are deployed many times, of which 
you speak.

                                                            -- Mike

From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Phil 
Hunt
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 10:21 AM
To: John Bradley
Cc: oauth list
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] FYI per a request on the last conference call, this is 
a method for making client registration stateless.

I am assuming that this draft fits with the dyn reg draft.  It makes the 
assumption that every single client is somehow potentially different in terms 
of registration.  This draft encodes the registration values in the JWT so that 
stateless registration can be achieved.

Dynamic registration takes a different view from client association, in that 
dynamic registration has no notion of fixed client software releases that are 
deployed many times. As such there is no fixed registration profile. Every 
client is potentially different. In contrast Client Association + Software 
statements, clients are identified as a particular software and are fixed.

Have I read this correctly?

>From a policy perspective, how would a service provider handle registration of 
>clients that are all potentially different? Why would individual clients need 
>to differ in registration (other than in the tokens negotiated with a 
>particular deployment SP)?

Phil

@independentid
www.independentid.com<http://www.independentid.com>
phil.h...@oracle.com<mailto:phil.h...@oracle.com>

On 2013-10-14, at 5:01 PM, John Bradley 
<ve7...@ve7jtb.com<mailto:ve7...@ve7jtb.com>> wrote:


A new version of I-D, draft-bradley-stateless-oauth-client-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by John Bradley and posted to the
IETF repository.

Filename:         draft-bradley-stateless-oauth-client
Revision:         00
Title:                Stateless Client Identifier for OAuth 2
Creation date:  2013-10-15
Group:              Individual Submission
Number of pages: 4
URL:             
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-bradley-stateless-oauth-client-00.txt
Status:          
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bradley-stateless-oauth-client
Htmlized:        
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bradley-stateless-oauth-client-00


Abstract:
  This draft provides a method for communicating information about an
  OAuth client through its client identifier allowing for fully
  stateless operation.





Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at 
tools.ietf.org<http://tools.ietf.org/>.

The IETF Secretariat
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org<mailto:OAuth@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to