See below.
Phil

@independentid
www.independentid.com
phil.h...@oracle.com







On 2013-08-27, at 4:27 PM, John Bradley <ve7...@ve7jtb.com> wrote:

> It is better.  We need to talk about what you have done with "min_alv" vs 
> "acr" from  connect which is extensible via a IANA registry of Authentication 
> contexts.
> 
> If it came down to reserving the strings 1 2 3 4 for the ISO29115 reference 
> that could probably be arranged.
> 
> I don't know that throwing an error if the min can't be supported is the 
> correct thing.  We had a lot of debate about that and decided that returning 
> the actual acr and letting the client decide was better than an error.
[PH[ I agree.
> 
> Also remember that the request is not signed so someone could modify it to 
> remove min_alv and spoof a RP that expects all positive results to meet what 
> it asked for.
> 
> More discussion on min_alv is required.
[PH] Yes. Returning what actually was done without an error is a better 
approach.

Also, just noticed that the "hint" parameter should be "login_hint". 

I think we also need to discuss how the client detects the profile API type and 
whether the AS can return multiple endpoints (and is that even a good thing).  
A structured attribute giving endpoint type and URL might be the way to go.

> 
> John B.
> 
> On 2013-08-27, at 12:52 PM, Phil Hunt <phil.h...@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
>> FYI.  Based on feedback from Berlin, Tony and I have revised the draft to 
>> include:
>> 
>> * Alignment with OpenID Connect (using id_token)
>> * Always returns a JWT
>> * Minimum assertion level on request
>> * Return information about the type of authentication performed
>> 
>> Thanks for your input.
>> 
>> Phil
>> 
>> @independentid
>> www.independentid.com
>> phil.h...@oracle.com
>> 
>> 
>> Begin forwarded message:
>> 
>>> From: internet-dra...@ietf.org
>>> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-hunt-oauth-v2-user-a4c-01.txt
>>> Date: 27 August, 2013 8:56:45 AM PDT
>>> To: Phil Hunt <phil.h...@yahoo.com>, Anthony Nadalin 
>>> <tony...@microsoft.com>, Tony Nadalin <tony...@microsoft.com>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> A new version of I-D, draft-hunt-oauth-v2-user-a4c-01.txt
>>> has been successfully submitted by Phil Hunt and posted to the
>>> IETF repository.
>>> 
>>> Filename:    draft-hunt-oauth-v2-user-a4c
>>> Revision:    01
>>> Title:               OAuth 2.0 User Authentication and Consent For Clients
>>> Creation date:       2013-08-27
>>> Group:               Individual Submission
>>> Number of pages: 10
>>> URL:             
>>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hunt-oauth-v2-user-a4c-01.txt
>>> Status:          
>>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hunt-oauth-v2-user-a4c
>>> Htmlized:        http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hunt-oauth-v2-user-a4c-01
>>> Diff:            
>>> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-hunt-oauth-v2-user-a4c-01
>>> 
>>> Abstract:
>>>   This specification defines a new OAuth2 endpoint that enables user
>>>   authentication session and consent information to be shared with
>>>   client applications.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
>>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>>> 
>>> The IETF Secretariat
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> OAuth mailing list
>> OAuth@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
> 

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to