Just to add more support for the usefulness of the chaining, OpenID Connect's aggregated claims model indeed falls under this category.
Sent from iPad 2012/11/29 7:44、Phil Hunt <phil.h...@oracle.com> wrote: All, After a request at IETF85 and a reminder from Hannes, I've posted a refresh of my original chaining document. No changes have been made in the refresh. My current position is that this type of chaining (as defined in my earlier draft) is useful when you need to get a new token after crossing an administrative boundary. It is less useful when you have servers wanting to chain in essentially an act on behalf of case where a 1-leg solution is more desirable and 2-legs are costly. My plan is to work with Justin and reconcile with his work on http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-richer-oauth-chain-00.txt A new version of I-D, draft-hunt-oauth-chain-01.txt has been successfully submitted by Phil Hunt and posted to the IETF repository. Filename: draft-hunt-oauth-chain Revision: 01 Title: Chain Grant Type for OAuth2 Creation date: 2012-11-28 WG ID: Individual Submission Number of pages: 10 URL: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hunt-oauth-chain-01.txt Status: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hunt-oauth-chain Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hunt-oauth-chain-01 Diff: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-hunt-oauth-chain-01 Abstract: This specification defines a method by which an OAuth protected service, can use a received oauth token from its client, to in turn, act as a client and access another OAuth protected service in a 'chained' profile. Phil @independentid www.independentid.com phil.h...@oracle.com _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth