On 2012-07-18 13:37, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
On 17/07/2012 19:01, Mike Jones wrote:
You should actually probably make that name change request to the
HTTPbis working group. I suspect that if they decide to change the
name, that we could direct the RFC editor to make the same name change
as HTTPbis does.
It looks like the discussion of changing this in HTTPBIS is in progress
now.
We made that change in HTTPbis, but bearer still seems to use
"b64token". Can this be fixed in AUTH48???
Best regards, Julian
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
