Hi Hannes,
I'm unfortunately had to cancel my trip to IETF-84. Phil will cover
the status
of the threat model document. But none of the authors of the
Revocation Draft
will be attending. So I would ask you to postpone the presentation
of this I-D
to the next IETF meeting as well.
best regards,
Torsten.
Am 23.07.2012 17:02, schrieb Thomas Hardjono:
Hannes, Derek,
Would it possible to postpone presentation/discussion of the
Dyn-Reg
draft (Dynamic Client Registration Protocol) to the
Atlanta/November
IETF meeting?
The reason is that none of the proposers will be attending the
Vancouver IETF in-person.
Thanks.
/thomas/
__________________________________________
-----Original Message-----
From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org]
On
Behalf
Of Hannes Tschofenig
Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2012 1:58 PM
To: John Bradley
Cc: oauth@ietf.org WG
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IETF
meeting
requested
Hi all,
I have uploaded an agenda for the meeting.
I am assuming that all these items do not require discussion
time
anymore:
* draft-ietf-oauth-assertions
* draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer
* draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns
* draft-ietf-oauth-v2
* draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer
Hence, we can focus on the new items. As discussed in the
mail below
I
put a separate slot for discussion of the
holder-of-the-key/MAC
token
security discussion on the agenda. I would suggest that a
couple of
us
meeting during the IETF week to work together on a
presentation that
provides some concrete suggestions for next steps to the
rest of the
group.
I also put the following persons on the spot for the
presentations
of
working group items:
- OAuth Dynamic Client Registration Protocol (Thomas)
- JSON Web Token (JWT) (Mike)
- JSON Web Token (JWT) Bearer Token Profiles for OAuth 2.0
(Mike)
- Token Revocation (Torsten)
- SAML 2.0 Bearer Assertion Profiles for OAuth 2.0 (Brian)
- OAuth Use Cases (Zachary)
Let me know if you want someone else to give the
presentation.
As a preparation for the meeting it would be good if you
could
(a) identify the open issues with your document, and
(b) find one or two reviewers to have a look at your
document during
the next two weeks.
Ciao
Hannes
On Jul 15, 2012, at 5:59 PM, John Bradley wrote:
Yes we need to get clearer on the the threats and use
cases.
I think Phil Hunt has some though there is likely
overlap.
Part of the problem with MAC was people never agreed on
the
threats
it was mitigating.
I can present something or coordinate with Tony or Phil.
John B.
On 2012-07-14, at 9:36 PM, Anthony Nadalin wrote:
How about a few min on proof-of-possession
requirements? I can
present our use cases and requirements
-----Original Message-----
From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org
[mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On
Behalf Of Mike Jones
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 4:42 PM
To: Hannes Tschofenig; oauth@ietf.org WG
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the
Vancouver IETF
meeting
requested
I'm willing to do 5 minutes on the status of the
Core and Bearer
documents.
I'm willing to give an update on JWT and the JWT
Bearer -
probably
15 minutes. It's probably good that we're a day after the
JOSE WG
meeting, given the JWT dependency upon the JOSE specs.
I'm willing to be part of a discussion on the
Assertions draft,
but
would appreciate doing this with Brian and/or Chuck - I'm
guessing
15
minutes for that as well. (I'm not certain this will be
needed, but
I'd like to review the recent changes before saying that
it's not.)
Looking forward to seeing many of you in Vancouver!
-- Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org
[mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On
Behalf Of Hannes Tschofenig
Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2012 12:46 AM
To: oauth@ietf.org WG
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver
IETF meeting
requested
Hi all,
I have requested a 2,5 hour slot for the upcoming
meeting.
While the next meeting is still a bit away it is
nevertheless
useful
to hear
* whether you plan to attend the next meeting, and
* whether you want to present something.
I could imagine that these documents will be
discussed:
* draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg
* draft-ietf-oauth-json-web-token
* draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer
* draft-ietf-oauth-revocation
* draft-ietf-oauth-use-cases
To the draft authors of these docuemnts: Please
think about the
open
issues and drop a mail to the list so that we make some
progress
already before the face-to-face meeting.
I am assume that the following documents do not
require any
discussion time at the upcoming IETF meeting anymore:
* draft-ietf-oauth-assertions
* draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer
* draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns
* draft-ietf-oauth-v2
* draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer
Ciao
Hannes
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
