I'm confused by this change given the access_token (or oauth_token) parameter being the most widely deployed usage of the protocol over the past eighteen months:
* https://developers.facebook.com/docs/reference/api/ * https://developers.google.com/accounts/docs/OAuth2WebServer#callinganapi * http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/live/hh243647#response * http://develop.github.com/p/oauth.html --David On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:35 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.resc...@gmx.de>wrote: > On 2012-05-18 09:15, Julian Reschke wrote: > >> ... >> Did you consider to *also* move the whole section into an appendix, so >> that it's status is also reflected by the document structure? >> >> Best regards, Julian >> > > Hi, it would be awesome to see feedback on this (it has been mentioned > during IETF LC multiple times). > > > Best regards, Julian > ______________________________**_________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/**listinfo/oauth<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth> >
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
