Why? What's the gain here? The only purpose of the registry is to avoid 
namespace collision. There can be no collision between the core specification 
and the bearer specification. They are describing completely different things. 
IANA does all the work anyway, and they two registry CAN share one review 
mailing list.

EH

> -----Original Message-----
> From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of John Bradley
> Sent: Monday, May 07, 2012 4:20 PM
> To: Hannes Tschofenig
> Cc: oauth@ietf.org WG
> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Error Registry Consensus Call
> 
> b)  Unless we remove the OAuth specific errors from bearer it should be in
> oath-v2.
> 
> One registry is preferable.
> 
> John B.
> On 2012-05-07, at 6:48 PM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> >
> > there is an open issue concerning draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-19 that may
> impact draft-ietf-oauth-v2-26 (depending on it's resolution) and we would
> like to get feedback from the working group about it.
> >
> > Here is the issue: When a client makes an access to a protected resources
> then things may go wrong and an error may be returned in response. draft-
> ietf-oauth-v2-bearer talks about this behavior.
> >
> > That's great but these error codes need to be registered somewhere. Note
> that the registry can be created in one document while the values can be
> registered by many documents.
> >
> > So, where should the registry be?
> >
> > There are two choices.
> >
> > a) A new OAuth errors registry goes into draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer.
> >
> > b) draft-ietf-oauth-v2 expands the scope of the existing OAuth Errors
> registry to encompass errors returned from resource servers.
> >
> > Currently, draft-ietf-oauth-v2 creates registries for error codes only for 
> > the
> exchanges from A-to-D (symbols used from Figure 1 of draft-ietf-oauth-v2),
> but excludes registration of errors from flows E-F.
> >
> > We must create a registry for error codes from flows E-F.  In which
> document do we want to create this registry?
> >
> > So, give us your feedback whether you have a preference by the end of
> the week.
> >
> > Ciao
> > Hannes & Derek
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OAuth mailing list
> > OAuth@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to