This topic should not have been raised again with this mailing list as we did reach a consensus before. What happened was that Barry sent a targeted email to some people, including Michael Thomas, regarding some additional wording as part of his shepard review. Michael inadvertently replied to this email list
If everyone could avoid replying to this thread, we can resolve our differences with the smaller mail group thanks Mark oauth-boun...@ietf.org wrote on 24/04/2012 19:05:55: > From: > > Eran Hammer <e...@hueniverse.com> > > To: > > Peter Saint-Andre <stpe...@stpeter.im> > > Cc: > > "oauth-cha...@tools.ietf.org" <oauth-cha...@tools.ietf.org>, > "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org> > > Date: > > 24/04/2012 19:06 > > Subject: > > Re: [OAUTH-WG] Shepherd review of draft-ietf-oauth-v2-threatmodel > > Sent by: > > oauth-boun...@ietf.org > > Berry did make a consensus call when this was originally raised. > > EH > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Peter Saint-Andre [mailto:stpe...@stpeter.im] > > Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 9:53 AM > > To: Eran Hammer > > Cc: oauth-cha...@tools.ietf.org; oauth@ietf.org > > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Shepherd review of draft-ietf-oauth-v2- > > threatmodel > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On 4/24/12 10:20 AM, Eran Hammer wrote: > > > We've been kicking this can of silliness for months now because one > > > person refuses to move on even in the face of otherwise unanimous > > > consensus from the group. > > > > Hi Eran, > > > > Cans of silliness aside, I'd like to make a brief meta point: we > don't vote. So > > consensus is not a matter of counting noses, it is a matter of > addressing valid > > technical issues that people raise. I shall re-read this thread and related > > earlier threads to see if the issues raised by Michael Thomas have been > > answered, but if there are open issues then we need to address them. Now, > > it might be that he hasn't accepted the answers provided, in which case he > > might be "in the rough". That's the chairs' call. But it's not > necessarily a simple > > matter of saying that one person disagrees therefore we can move on. > > However, I think you know that anyway. :) > > > > Peter > > > > - -- > > Peter Saint-Andre > > https://stpeter.im/ > > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin) > > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > > > iEYEARECAAYFAk+W2nAACgkQNL8k5A2w/vxQyACgyCDPDrxbFKLcntB2uu8TF > > +Zu > > F24AoIfDHW+Z88nE16Wt+iLn+Dqch50l > > =5WMm > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
