MUST sounds reasonable
Eran Hammer <e...@hueniverse.com> schrieb: The current text: If the issued access token scope is different from the one requested by the client, the authorization server SHOULD include the "scope" response parameter to inform the client of the actual scope granted. Stephen asked why not a MUST. I think it should be MUST. Any disagreement? EHL
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
