At 14:12 08-01-2012, agks mehx wrote:
I reported this to the vendor and the vendor claims that the IETF
draft specification says scope is OPTIONAL and that means the vendor
is free to make it required in a conforming implementation.
If a bit is said to be optional, it means that it will not cause any
interoperability issues if that bit is added or not added. If the
vendor claims that the bit is required in a conforming
implementation, they are free to do so as the decision about what
conforms of what does not conform is theirs alone.
From your message, it is not clear whether you are:
(i) Asking for a clarification in a specification; or
(ii) Trying to resolve a disagreement with a vendor.
Regards,
-sm
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
