Hi Bob, the question is only how to provide extensibility then. You are then essentially forced to know, because of pre-arrangements, what the content of the blob is going to be.
Is that also fine for you? On Oct 14, 2011, at 7:04 PM, Bob Van Zant wrote: > I'm in favor of removing the auth param option. It seems that half the > point of the Bearer token is to have a very simple way of passing > around opaque tokens. > > If there are reasons for building a more feature-ful token with cool > parameters then let's bring about a new token type. For now I like the > brain dead simple Bearer: > > credentials = "Bearer" 1*SP b64token > > -Bob Ciao Hannes _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
