On 2011-09-26 22:10, Mike Jones wrote:
Getting rid of the b64token would be an unnecessary breaking change. ...
You're at draft state, right?If you want to keep b64token *and* be able to use params, then you'll need an alternate syntax that puts the token into param (which, arguably, would have been the better choice anyway).
Best regards, Julian _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
